Whenever a significant prize-giving event approaches, there’s always a clamor for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge underappreciated efforts and satisfy the spirits of fans who have specialized interests.
A fellow writer has already made supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. So would strategy board titles, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward because like all dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request is the most urgent and important of all. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.
Organizing Gaming Categories
Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that movie academies steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an essential concession within the realm of video games, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute as a single art form.
For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.
Current Gaming Award Categories
The major gaming awards currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types actually cover numerous genres, making space possible for numerous titles.
Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists to put them. Consider three of recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.
The Representation Problem
Many instances occur of brilliant puzzle games published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive Indie races.
- A renowned logic title got overlooked in any category that year
- A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
- Popular arranging title got ignored recently
- Just some logic titles barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications
Significance of Puzzle Games
Commonly they're small games, but the art of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most engaged experiences in the world continuing this trend for many years.
The famous puzzle experience competes with popular creative games for the title of best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.
Proposal and Rationale
Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. You could fill multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.
Restating the point, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary interactive creation, producing among the purest expressions of the video game form. Just like cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.
